(Another example of name-value pairs.) On the second copy only include the protocol author's name. It will be returned to the protocol author. For each protocol you grade please put the protocol authors copy on a separate piece of paper. This means you need to turn in at least three separate pieces of paper: one containing your answers for the instructor, one for protocol author A and one for protocol author B.
If you make additional comments on the protocol description you are grading, please turn back the protocol description so it can be returned to its author. If you do not make any comments on the protocol description you are grading, do not return it.
1) How easy was it to read and understand the protocol description?
2) Was the protocol description defined well enough to allow you to implement a server
for the protocol? If no, what was the problem. If yes, would you prefer implementing a
server for your protocol or the one you are grading?
3) Is the protocol complete? Are the operations that can not be done in the protocol?